We
always claimed that the oil infrastructures was constructed by revenue
generated through agriculture and mineral resources, but what stop the
northerners that ruled this country from investing revenue generated
from oil, to massively develop agriculture and mineral resources?
The same people blackmailing the southerners about the fact that revenue from agriculture was used to developed the oil infrastructures, are the first to call Ahmad Sardauna Ina Dalili names, because he criticize the inadequate funding to agriculture and minerals development.
What we suppose to be asking those telling us that oil infrastructures was constructed by revenue generated from agriculture and mineral resources,is that they should be able to tell us the percentage of what was allocated for the construction and development of the oil industry by then, so that we can have better analyses, to know whether we spend less on agricultural and minerals development with oil money or we spent more for the development of oil industries with revenue generated from agriculture and mineral resources.
What we should be doing is to advocate for more funding to agricultural and mineral resources development, not this old story using grand nut and cotton money to developed oil infrastructure, because that no longer sell market.
You can invest more than 1trillion on agriculture in Lagos alone, the smallest state in term of land mars and much more to develop the minerals resources within the southwest. my point is that, investing in agricultural and minerals development doesn't necessary mean investing in the north, because even if its true that revenue generated from agriculture was used in developing the oil industries as claimed, the agricultural product comes from all over Nigeria, such as cocoa, palm oil, etc.
No investment is too much for agricultural and mineral resources development. @Ahmad dacholom
The same people blackmailing the southerners about the fact that revenue from agriculture was used to developed the oil infrastructures, are the first to call Ahmad Sardauna Ina Dalili names, because he criticize the inadequate funding to agriculture and minerals development.
What we suppose to be asking those telling us that oil infrastructures was constructed by revenue generated from agriculture and mineral resources,is that they should be able to tell us the percentage of what was allocated for the construction and development of the oil industry by then, so that we can have better analyses, to know whether we spend less on agricultural and minerals development with oil money or we spent more for the development of oil industries with revenue generated from agriculture and mineral resources.
What we should be doing is to advocate for more funding to agricultural and mineral resources development, not this old story using grand nut and cotton money to developed oil infrastructure, because that no longer sell market.
You can invest more than 1trillion on agriculture in Lagos alone, the smallest state in term of land mars and much more to develop the minerals resources within the southwest. my point is that, investing in agricultural and minerals development doesn't necessary mean investing in the north, because even if its true that revenue generated from agriculture was used in developing the oil industries as claimed, the agricultural product comes from all over Nigeria, such as cocoa, palm oil, etc.
No investment is too much for agricultural and mineral resources development. @Ahmad dacholom
No comments:
Post a Comment